(IAI H3 901)
I.
COURSE LOCATION
X ON
CAMPUS CCC
II. COURSE IDENTIFICATION
PREFIX: LITO NUMBER:
107 NAME:
Introduction to Fiction
3 LECTURE HOURS LIBA 04900 CURRICULUM
& NO.
0 LABORATORY HOURS 1.1/230301 PCS-CIPS NUMBER
3 CREDIT HOURS N VARIABLE (Y/N)
0 CLINICAL
HOURS N REPEATABLE
(Y/N)
0 SOE
HOURS 0 TIMES
III. DIVISION TO WHICH COURSE IS ASSIGNED
X BACCALAUREATE/TRANSFER
CAREER EDUCATION
CONTINUING
COMMUNITY EDUCATION
ABE/ASE
HEALTH
OCCUPATIONS
OTHER
IV. CATALOG DESCRIPTION OF COURSE
V.
PREREQUISITES FOR THE COURSE
.
None
VI. METHODS OF INSTRUCTION
X DISCUSSION‑LECTURE SEMINAR
LABORATORY TELE‑LECTURE (FILM‑TV)
CORRESPONDENCE LABORATORY‑DISCUSSION
TELEVISION (TELECOURSE) LECTURE
RADIO LECTURE‑LABORATORY
INDEPENDENT STUDY OTHER (IDENTIFY):
CO‑OP
VII. OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE (USE ADDITIONAL
PAGES AS NECESSARY)
A. To
provide students a basic competence in using the tools and techniques of
literary analysis.
B. To provide a basic vocabulary and understanding of what fiction
is and the nature of its concerns.
C.
To foster a basic appreciation of the genres of literature, the short story and
novel.
D.
To assist students in intelligently expressing themselves in composition work.
VIII. A.
REQUIRED TEXTBOOK(S)
TITLE:
Introduction to Fiction
AUTHOR(S): Kennedy and Gioia
COPYRIGHT DATE: 2007
EDITION: 10th
PUBLISHING COMPANY: Pearson Longman
TITLE:
AUTHOR(S):
COPYRIGHT DATE: EDITION:
PUBLISHING COMPANY:
B.
REQUIRED WORKBOOK(S)
TITLE:
AUTHOR(S):
COPYRIGHT DATE: EDITION:
PUBLISHING COMPANY:
IX. SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
IDENTIFY GENERAL SOURCES:
Paperback
novels—instructor’s choice
IF EXTENSIVE COLLATERAL
BOOKS,
PROVIDE INFORMATION.
X.
METHODS OF EVALUATION OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN THE COURSE
Combination
objective and written examinations, out‑of‑class critical
appraisals totaling 9-12 pages, and class participation in discussion. Further readings and
examples on reserve in library.
(All
Humanities courses at
XI. COURSE OUTLINE
I. Reading a Story.
A. Fable and Tale.
B. Plot.
C. The Short Story.
D. John Updike on
Writing, Why Write?
What's the Plot?
II. Point of View.
A.
Katherine Mansfield on Writing, Creating "Miss Brill."
B. How Point of View Shapes a Story.
C. Student Essay: Raymond Carver's Use
of First-Person Point of View in "Cathedral."
III. Character.
A. How Character
Creates Action.
IV. Setting.
A. Amy Tan on Writing, Setting the
Voice.
B. How Time and Place Set a Story.
V. Tone and Style.
A.
Irony.
B.
Ernest Hemingway on Writing, the Direct Style.
Be Style Conscious.
VI. Theme.
A. Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., on Writing, the Themes of Science
Fiction.
B. Stating the Theme.
VII. Symbol.
A. Recognizing Symbols.
B. Student Essay. An Analysis of the Symbolism in Steinbeck's
"The Chrysanthemums."
VIII. Evaluating a Story.
A. Ralph Lombreglia
on Writing, Creating "Jungle Video."
B. Know What You're Judging.
IX. Reading Long Stories and Novels.
A. Franz Kafka on Writing, Discussing The
Metamorphosis.
B. Leaving Things Out
X. A Writer in Depth.
A. Flannery O'Connor on Writing,
The Element of Suspense in "A Good Man is Hard to Find."
B. Flannery O'Connor on Writing, The Serious Writer
and the Tired Reader.
C. How One Story Illuminates Another.
XI. Stories for Further
XII. Writing About
Literature.
A. Beginning.
B. Discovering and Planning.
C. Drafting and Revising.
D. The Form of Your Finished Paper.
E. Documenting Your Sources.
F. Reference Guide for Citations.
G. Keeping a Journal.
H. The Girl Writing Her English Paper,
Robert Wallace.
XIII. Writing About a Story.
A. Explicating.
B. Student Essay (Explication).
C. Analyzing.
D. Student Essay (Analysis).
E. Student Card Report.
F. Comparing and Contrasting.
G. Suggestions for Writing.
XIV. Writing and Researching on the Computer.
A. Writing and
Revising.
B. Using Spell-Check Programs.
C. Researching on the World Wide Web.
D.
E. Plagiarism.
F. Literature Online
XV. Critical Approaches to Literature.
A. Formalist
Criticism.
B. Biographical Criticism.
C. Historical Criticism.
D. Psychological Criticism.
E. Mythological Criticism.
F. Sociological Criticism.
G. Gender Criticism.
H. Reader-Response Criticism.
I. Deconstructionist Criticism.
J. Cultural Studies.
XVI. Longer Works of
Fiction
A.
The Novella
B.
The Novel
NOTE:
ü As part of the
PREPARED BY:
REVIEW/REVISION DATE:
REVIEWED BY:
Introduction
to Fiction, Lito 107, Student Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcome I:
Students should be able to read, understand, interpret,
and evaluate literary work.
More specifically, they should be able to do the following:
1. Recognize,
recall, and summarize material read.
2. Predict and
question the text during and after reading.
3. Understand the
various purposes for reading.
4. Be cognizant of the difficulties of the text and aware of
their own abilities and deficiencies.
5. Appreciate the
importance of motivation.
6. Draw
inferences thus enhancing appreciation for the complexities of the text.
7. Synthesize
information previously read with the current text.
8. Evaluate the
worth and value of the text.
9. Judge the
accuracy and reliability of the text.
Learning Outcome II:
Students
should be able to express and develop their ideas of the literary text by
writing grammatical, organized, and coherent essays.
More specifically, the students should be able to do the
following:
1. Generate ideas
by using various strategies to analyze the text.
2. Write for a
specific college audience and purpose, thus using appropriate language and
style.
3. Develop an
essay with a clear thesis.
4. Support that thesis
with textual information.
5. Organize the
essay coherently and logically using appropriate rhetorical strategies.
6. Write in
standard, written English.
7. Revise and
proofread.
8. Use writing as
a means of developing thought and clarifying ideas.
Learning Outcome III:
Students
should be exposed to a variety of writers, ideas, artistic motives, and
genres. The students should also be
introduced to the vocabulary necessary to understand literature. More importantly, they should discover those
universal themes and ideas that have motivated human beings to express
themselves in language, ranging from mundane concerns to their highest
aspirations.
More specifically, the student should be able to do the
following:
1. Recognize the various strategies for
examining a literary text.
2. Distinguish
among popular and serious fiction.
3. Understand the elements of the various
literary subgenres, including the short story, the novella, and the novel.
4. Comprehend
figurative language.
5. Discover literary themes and their
traditions, both American and English traditions, history, and writers.
6. Recognize and
appreciate the implications of symbolism, allegory, and myth.
7. Incorporate much of the more subtle and
specific literary terms into their vocabulary.
8. Appreciate the universal themes and the
transcultural themes that give literary study a
global perspective.
9. Understand
the works of major writers in each genre so as to see the genre's history and
changes within that genre relevant to the specific era; for example, Hardy must
be seen in terms of Victorian society but the influences on Hardy's form and
ideas and his influence on future British and American writers are also
relevant.
10. Cultivate an awareness of art's role in
everyday life and to appreciate the relevancy between life and art.
11. See
fiction as an expression of human values, to see values as a necessary
ingredient in all human endeavor, yet simultaneously
maintain that tolerance for differing views is fundamental in artistic
expression and for the academic discipline and its discourse.
English
Department
COMPOSITION GRADING
STANDARDS
While appreciating the individualism inherent in the essay
grading process, the department adheres to the holistic method of evaluating
essays and expects consideration of content, structure, and mechanics. The
following standards in grading are designed to establish uniformity among all
teachers of Composition:
EXCELLENT ESSAY --A
Content-- The content of the A essay exhibits a
mature level of thought with a clearly stated thesis and abundant support in
the forms of concrete examples, details, and reasoning. The essay addresses the
specified audience and the assigned rhetorical mode.
Structure—It
is structured with a complete introduction, graceful transitions through
supporting paragraphs, and a fitting conclusion.
Mechanics—Mechanically,
the paper employs a variety of sentence structures, precise word choice, and
figures of speech to create a clear tone; it is void of repetition, wordiness,
and colloquialisms.
GOOD ESSAY-- B
Content-- The B essay
has a clearly stated thesis; the supporting paragraphs exhibit adequate
examples and details with clear reasoning. The essay addresses the specified
audience and the assigned rhetorical mode.
Structure-- The structure
displays an introduction, clear transitions, and an acceptable conclusion. If
not highly impactful, it has few structural weaknesses.
Mechanics-- The paper's
mechanics consist of a variety of sentence structures and accurate word
choices; it has few errors in Standard English. However, a mere absence of
errors should not be rewarded with a grade of 6-.
AVERAGE ESSAY--C
Content-- The average essay has a clearly stated
thesis; however, it is often trite or general. It attempts to display examples
and details, but fails to provoke thought. The essay fails to address the
specified audience, but it does reflect the assigned rhetorical mode.
Structure-- The structure
presents a beginning, middle, and end, but lacks transitions. It has few
structural weaknesses, but oftentimes structure is its 9nly strength.
Mechanics--Sentence structures
are not varied and are often repetitive; unique word choices are not apparent.
Errors in Standard English are commonplace; however, the essay does not have
major sentence errors, such as comma splices, fragments, and run-ons.
POOR ESSAY--D
Content—The poor essay
lacks a clearly stated thesis. It fails
to display examples and details, but instead the paragraphs are filled with
repeated generalities. The essay fails
to address the specified audience, and oftentimes it does not even reflect the
assigned rhetorical mode.
Structure—The structure
presents a beginning, middle, and end, but lacks transitions. The body paragraphs show little unity, order,
or coherence.
Mechanics—Sentence structures are mostly simple
and most sentences restate the previous thought; simple word choices ("their"and"its") are incorrect and confused.
The most flagrant errors in Standard English are prevalent. Most seriously, a few comma splices,
fragments, and run-ons remain uncorrected.
FAILING ESSAY—F
Content—This essay
lacks a clearly stated thesis. It fails
to display examples and details, but instead the paragraphs are filled with repeated
generalities. The essay fails to address
the specified audience, and oftentimes it does not even reflect the assigned
rhetorical mode.
Structure—The structure
fails to present a beginning, middle, and end.
The body paragraphs do not show unity, order, or coherence.
Mechanics—Sentence structures are mostly simple
and most sentences restate the previous thought; simple word choices ("their"and"its") are incorrect and confused.
The most flagrant errors in Standard English are prevalent. Most seriously, many comma splices,
fragments, and run-ons remain uncorrected.
Failure to
eliminate comma splices, fragments, and run-ons from any essay should
constitute a failing grade for the assignment.
Each embedded writing
assignment will be evaluated based upon a variety of criteria that together
form the basis of the Humanities component of the General Education
curriculum. Please assign a number from
1 to 5 for each criterion. 1 =
Unacceptable, 2
= Poor, 3 = Average, 4 = Good, 5 = Very Good, N/A = Not applicable
Criteria:
|
Student # |
Comprehension of the individual work |
Aesthetic and cultural appreciation |
Understanding of the work in its historical context |
Analysis of Form |
|
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
|
|
Faculty
Guide
ASSESSMENT

Contacts: Danny Stover, ext. 3336
Sue
Hardebeck, ext. 3338
Steve
Normansell, ext. 3340
For
Further Information/
Ancillary
Material
The Philosophy of
Assessment at
“Student learning” is the core focus of our
institutional effectiveness plan, and our more specific assessment plan and
strategies have but one primary purpose—improving student learning in the
future. Despite the semantic distinction and the confusion between
institutional effectiveness and assessment, the governing question forming the
foundation of our assessment philosophy is simple: What can we do as faculty to
improve student learning, and equally important, what can students do to
improve? Obviously, each student learns
differently, every course varies, not all programs can be assessed identically,
and every faculty member’s style is unique; therefore, there is necessarily a
complexity, as well as a need for subtlety, in order to achieve a
comprehensive, coherent, and personally rewarding and meaningful assessment
strategy. But underlying all levels of
assessment is the simple dictate to which faculty and students alike are
committed: We are embarked on an
on-going, comprehensive assessment strategy that will both document and
improve student learning.
Furthermore,
Assessment Forms and The Role of All Faculty
A five-part sequence
provides the pedagogical framework of our assessment plan. The institution has
a mission statement and goals, all departments and programs have articulated
missions, goals, and outcomes, and each course has objectives and student
learning outcomes; thus all parts are connected to, derive meaning from, and
fulfill the whole. Fourth, a series of
forms has been developed in order to allow flexibility and to provide faculty
with a means of measuring student learning outcomes and, most importantly,
changing in order to improve student learning.
Finally, students are active participants and are engaged in the
assessment process.
A
Quick Checklist Of What To Do
ü Check out the assessment
room (Dean’s office) and familiarize yourself with the institution’s
and with your department’s mission, departmental goals, and outcomes.
ü Every course has a
departmental master syllabus. You must
include these objectives and the learning outcomes on your first-day
syllabus.
ü All programs must have an assessment plan on
file. If you are in charge of a program,
submit the program assessment plan at the beginning of the year; gather the
data and analyze; and then submit the results at the end of the year along with
how you will change in order to improve.
ü If you teach courses
only, there are faculty forms on the back page to help you begin documenting
the assessment of student learning.
ü Include students in
surveys and CAT’s.
Try using focus groups, etc.!
Faculty Assessment of
Course Objectives
General Assessment
Strategies
Using Grades
This form lists all of the graded material that comprised a
student’s course grade and connects grade to course objectives.
Measurable
course objectives on syllabus (pick any two):
#1
#2
How were these
course objectives assessed?
#1
#2
#3
#4
Faculty Assessment of
Learning Outcomes
General Assessment
Strategies
Using
Classroom
Assessment
Techniques (CAT’s)
This form lists specific strategies for assessment of
learning outcomes and for daily or weekly improvement of student learning. These assessment techniques are independent
of --and in addition to-- grades and tests.
What were a few CAT’s
utilized this semester for specific Learning Outcomes? List outcome (a) and CAT (b):
#1. a.
b.
#2. a.
b.
#3. a.
b.
Complete
the
Analysis,
Results, and Changes
Faculty Name:
Semester, Year:
Course:
Date last taught:
This form summarizes the results of your assessment efforts
and proposes changes. Assessment must be
an on-going continuum, a process that forces change and improves student learning.)
What were some of the most significant
results that you received this semester?
What changes
are you going to implement to improve student learning?